| Regular
colloquia are Wednesdays, 2:00-4:00 p.m., 280 Park Hall, North (Amherst)
Campus, and are open to the public. Refreshments are served.
Other
colloquia and our distinguished speaker are on different days.
| Month |
Day |
Speaker/Title
|
| January |
21 |
James
Allen (james@cs.rochester.edu)
Department of Computer Science, University of Rochester
"CONVERSATIONAL PLANNING
AGENTS: THE TRAINS/TRIPS SYSTEMS"
|
| |
27 |
Allen
Lockwood (ahl@acsu.buffalo.edu)
VA Pet Center, Center
for Cognitive Science,
University at Buffalo
"FUNCTIONAL IMAGING OF THE HUMAN
AUDITORY SYSTEM AND AUDITORY PHENOMENA"
|
| February |
4 |
Phil
Merikle ( pmerikle@watarts.uwaterloo.ca )
Department of Psychology, University of Waterloo
"What Experimental Studies
of Perception Without Awareneess Reveal About Conscious
vs. Unconscious Cognition"
|
| |
11 |
Business
Meeting
|
| |
18 |
David
Noelle
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
"Modeling An Interference Effect
In Instructed Category Learning"
|
| |
25 |
Evan
Thompson (evant@yorku)
Centre for Vision Research,Department of Philosophy, York University
"Finding Out About Filling In"
|
| March |
4 |
Stuart
Shapiro ( shapiro@cse.buffalo.edu
)
Department of Computer
Science, State University
of New York at Buffalo
"A PROCEDURAL SOLUTION TO THE UNEXPECTED
HANGING AND SORITES PARADOX"
|
| |
11 |
No
meeting: Spring Break
|
| |
18 |
Robert
MacLaury (maclaury@sas.upenn.edu)
Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania
"Current Anthropological Research
on Color Categorization: Points of View in Categorization"
|
| |
25 |
Gail
Mauner (mauner@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Department
of Psychology, State University
of New York at Buffalo
"How Do We Know That The Ship Was
Sunk By Someone?"
|
| April |
1 |
Barry
Smith (phismith@acsu.buffalo.edu)
Philosophy,
SUNY Buffalo
"Introductory Tutorial on Searle's
Cognitive Theory of Social Ontology"
|
| |
1 |
Corinne
Jorgensen (cjorgens@acsu.buffalo.edu)
School
of Information and Library Studies, SUNY Buffalo
"Image Attributes: An Investigation"
|
| |
8 |
Melissa
Bowerman
Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
"Constructing
Spatial Semantic Categories: a Crosslinguistic Perspective"
|
| |
9 |
Melissa
Bowerman, Max Planck Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Distinguised
Speakers Series
"Where
do children's early word meanings come from?"
|
| |
15 |
Janet
Fodor, CUNY
"WHAT IS A PARAMETER?"
|
| |
22 |
Roberto
Casati (casati@poly.polytechnique.fr)
CNRS/CREA, Paris
"WHAT SOUNDS ARE"
|
| |
29 |
Ingvar
Johansson ( Ingvar.Johansson@philos.umu.se )
University of Umea, Sweden
"The Ontology of Patterns"
|
ABSTRACTS
Wednesday,
January 21, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
JAMES
F. ALLEN
"CONVERSATIONAL
PLANNING AGENTS:
THE TRAINS/TRIPS SYSTEMS"
A conversational
agent is a system that can engage in natural language conversation
in order to further its goals. In our TRAINS project, the goals consist
of simple planning and scheduling tasks, and the system supports mixed
initiative planning using several modes of communication: spoken and
keyboard natural language, mousable map displays, and menus. The project
represents a concerted effort to bring work in natural language understanding,
dialog modeling, and planning into a single coherent system. The TRAINS
system is a specific agent that can support unconstrained dialogue
in order to assist the user in solving randomly generated route planning
tasks. Significant effort has been made to make the system robust,
so that it can perform well even in the face of inevitable speech
recognition errors, and can continue the dialogue in a natural way
under any circumstances. This talk will discuss the overall project
and its accomplishments so far, and then focus on a few specific mechanisms
that enable robust dialogue behavior. Because the system can interact
in close to real time, it provides a firm basis for experimentation
and data collection to study different strategies for human-computer
dialogue for collaborative problem solving.
Refreshments will be available
All are welcome to attend
Back
to Top
Back to Calendar
Wednesday, January
28, 1998
280 Park Hall
2:00-3:30 p.m.
North Campus
ALAN
LOCKWOOD
Depts.
of Neurology, Nuclear Medicine, Communication Disorders and Sciences,
and
Center for Cognitive Science
"FUNCTIONAL
IMAGING OF THE HUMAN AUDITORY SYSTEM AND AUDITORY PHENOMENA"
We have used positron
emission tomography to map the human auditory stimuli. Stimulating
the auditory system with unilateral tones at 500 and 4000 Hz elicits
a systematic response in brainstem, midbrain, thalamic, and cortical
regions. Our study provides evidence for the existence of tonotopic
and ampilotopic organization of cortical portions of the central auditory
system. Acitvity in the posterior and mid portions of the cingulate
gyrus (BA 23) at low but not high intensity levels of stimuli may
be evidence that this brain region functions as a gain control center.
In studies of
patients with tinnitus, we found evidence for spontaneous neural
activity in the central auditory system that is not of cochlear
origin. In addition, tinnitus patients have abnormal links between
the auditory and limbic system that may account for the emotional
impact of tinniuts. Finally, tinnitus patients with hearing loss
express evidence for plastic transformations of the central auditory
system. We hypothesize that tinnitus may be the auditory system
analog of phantom limb sensations and that the nature and severity
of tinnitus may be dependent on the extent of the plastic changes.
Refreshments
will be available
All are welcome to attend
Back
to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday, February 4, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
PHIL
MERIKLE
Psychology,
University of Waterloo
"What
Experimental Studies of Perception
Without Awareness Reveal About
Conscious vs. Unconscious Cognition"
Perception can
occur without the subjective awareness of perceiving. In what ways
are perception without awareness and perception with awareness similar
or dissimilar? This question has been addressed in several ways. One
approach has been to induce conscious people to perceive unconsciously
by presenting stimuli under suboptimal conditions (e.g., short durations).
A second approach has been to induce conscious people to perceive
unconsciously by presenting stimuli outside their focus of attention.
A third approach has been to study people in whom unconsciousness
has been induced directly through the administration of surgical anesthesia.
Regardless of how unconsciousness is induced, stimuli can produce
qualitatively different consequences depending on whether they are
perceived with or without awareness. The studies reveal that consciously
perceived stimuli can guide intentional actions whereas unconsciously
perceived stimuli lead to more habitual reactions which may even interfere
with on-going intentional actions. These findings provide empirical
support for the widely held assumption that being conscious allows
us to act on the world and to produce effects on the world.
All
are invited to attend
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday,
February 18, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
DAVID
NOELLE
"Modeling
An Interference Effect In Instructed
Category Learning"
Category learning
is often seen as a process of inductive generalization from a set
of class-labeled exemplars. Human learners, however, often receive
direct instruction concerning the structure of a category before being
presented with examples. Such explicit knowledge may often be smoothly
integrated with knowledge garnered by exposure to instances, but not
always. Some interference effects have been observed. Specifically,
errors in instructed rule following may sometimes arise after the
repeated presentation of correctly labeled exemplars. Despite perfect
consistency between instance labels and the provided rule, such inductive
training can drive categorization behavior away from rule following
and towards a more prototype-based or instance-based pattern. In this
talk, I will present a general connectionist model of instructed category
learning which captures this kind of interference effect. I model
direct instruction as a sequence of inputs to an artificial neural
network which transforms such advice into a modulating force on classification
behavior. Exemplar-based learning is modeled in the usual way for
connectionist networks: as weight modification driven by error feedback.
The proposed network architecture allows instruction following and
exemplar-based learning to interact in a psychologically plausible
manner. Simulation results are provided on a simple instructed category
learning task, and these results are compared with human performance
on the same task.
All
are welcome to attend
Refreshments will be serve
Back
to Top
Back to Calendar
Wednesday,
February 25, 1998
2:00-3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
EVAN
THOMPSON
"FINDING
OUT ABOUT FILLING IN"
Abstract-Visual
scientists use the terms "filling in" and "perceptual
completion" to refer to situations where subjects report that
something is present in a particular region of visual space when it
is actually absent from that region, but present in the surrounding
area. Whether there is neural filling-in, however, is a matter of
great debate. I will first present a taxonomy of perceptual completion
phenomena to organize the discussion and then argue for the following
points: (1) Certain forms of perceptual completion seem to involve
spatially propogating neural activity (neural filling in) and so,
contrary to Daniel C. Dennett's position, cannot be described as the
results of the brain's "ignoring an absence" or "jumping
to a conclusion." (2) Nevertheless, neural filling-in does not
entail either "analytic isomorphism" or "Cartesian
materialism." (3) Most discussions of filling-in have been based
on a representational conception of vision. To reject this conception
in favour of an "enactive" or "animate" conception
reduces the importance of filling-in as a theoretical category in
the explanation of vision. (4) The evaluation of perceptual content
should not be dictated by "subpersonal" considerations about
internal processing, but rather by considerations about the task of
vision at the level of the animal or person interacting with the world.
All
are invited to attend
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Top
Back to Calendar
Wednesday,
March 4, 1998
280 Park Hall
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
North Campus
STUART
C. SHAPIRO
A
PROCEDURAL SOLUTION TO THE UNEXPECTED HANGING AND SORITES PARADOX
The paradox of
the Unexpected Hanging, related prediction paradoxes, and the sorites
paradoxes all involve reasoning about ordered collections of entities:
days ordered by date in the case of the Unexpected Hanging; men ordered
by the number of hairs on their heads in the case of the bald man
version of the sorites. The reasoning then assigns each entity a value
that depends on the previously assigned value of one of the neighboring
entities. The final result is paradoxical because it conflicts with
the obviously correct, commonsensical value. The paradox is due to
the serial procedure of assigning a value based on the newly assigned
value of the neighbor. An alternative procedure is to assign each
value based only on the original values of neighbors---a parallel
procedure. That procedure does not give paradoxical answers.
This paper was inspired by the paper, ``Treatment of Conflict: The
Pragmatic Dimension of Paradox,'' given by Mariam Thalos to the University
at Buffalo Center for Cognitive Science on October 22, 1997.
All are invited to attend
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday,
March 18, 1998
280 Park Hall
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
North Campus
ROBERT
MACLAURY
"Current
Anthropological Research
on Color Categorization:
Points of View in Categorization"
After Berlin
and Kay (cir. 1975) found neurally determined universals in color
categorization, blatant cross-cultural differences remained to be
explained. These consisted of different stages of color-cateogry
evolution, systems of categorizing color that did not fit the neurally-based
model, plasticity and change among color categories, and category-internal
semantic relations previously overlooked. Such observations were
enhanced by expansion of worldwide and regional surveys and by an
improvement of Munsell-chip interviewing methods.
This up-grading of data made it possible to formulate and test explanatory
models. Today we shall review one of these results, called vantage
theory, which has developed over the last 15 years (MacLaury 1997).
Vantage theory offers three levels of argumentation: (1) any person
constructs a category as though it were one or more points of view;
(2) the analogy is formed between the coordinates of space-time
and equivalent fixed and mobile reference points in categorical
cognition; (3) the analogy is wholly unconscious and neurally expedited
such as to enable people to form many categories in succession as
fast as they think and speak. We shall emphasize the evidence for
(1), the most accessible of these claims. The evidence consists
of statistically significant patterns among certain pairs of color
terms that occur commonly in language. Both terms name a single
color category from different slants, and the terms show a predictable
trajectory of change in their semantic relation as the category
divides over time. There are other sources of evidence, at least
100 replicable observations. But the approach here will be to review
a few of the major patterns, presenting material slowly while encouraging
questions throughout. The objective is to suggest one way that current
anthropological resarch on color semantics may contribute to interests
of cognitive science, especially the effort to understand the method
and process by which people categorize.
Reading: Maclaury, Robert E. 1997. Color and Cognition in Mesoamerica:
Constructing Categories as Vantages. Austin: University of Texas
Press.
All are welcome to attend
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday,
March 25, 1998
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
GAIL
MAUNER
"HOW
DO WE KNOW THAT THE SHIP
WAS SUNK BY SOMEONE?"
Typically, our
understanding of a sentence like "The ship was sunk" includes
an unexpressed agent who is responsible for sinking the ship. Within
the psychological literature, it is commonly assumed that this unexpressed
information is derived from stored conceptual knowledge. An alternative
view is that unexpressed agents are derived from linguistic sources
such as lexical representations and implicit grammatical knowledge.
In this talk, I will present recent data from experiments using
eye-monitoring, cross-modal naming, and word-by-word reading to
argue that (1) the unexpressed agent that is part of our understanding
of a sentence like "The ship was sunk" is derived from
linguistic sources; and (2) this information is accessed as soon
as a reader recognizes the main verb in an agentless passive sentence.
I will end by discussing the implications these data hold for theories
of modularity in language processing.
Back
to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday,
April 1, 1998
280 Park Hall
North Campus
2:00 -3:30 p.m.
BARRY SMITH
Introductory
Tutorial on
Searle's Cognitive Theory of Social Ontology
On April 24-25
the Center will co-sponsor a major international conference in Buffalo
on the topic of "Applied Ontology: Law and Institutions in Society".
The first day of the conference will be devoted to John Searle's book
The Construction of Social Reality, and John Searle will himself be
present. As part of the preparations for this conference Barry Smith
will give an introductory tutorial on Searle's cognitive theory of
social ontology.
All
are invited to attend
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Top
Back to Calendar
Wednesday,
April 1, 1998
280 Park Hall
North Campus
2:00 -3:30 p.m.
Corinne
Jorgensen
School
of Information and Library Studies, SUNY Buffalo
"Image
Attributes: An Investigation"
.
With the rapid
expansion in imaging technologies, access to collections of digital
images is a subject of major interest. Indexing systems and computerized
retrieval for images both need data concerning typically described
image attributes. To date, there is little research upon which to
base choices as to which attributes should be included in these
systems. This research is investigating attributes typically described
in several types of tasks using pictorial images. Participants performed
descriptive, categorizing, and searching tasks, and word and phrase
data were subjected to content analysis. Forty-two image attributes
and nine higher level attribute classes were described. The data
suggest that indexing of literal object is of prime significance,
as is indexing of the human form and other human characteristics.
Content/Story and other abstract attributes are also typically described,
suggesting that image indexing may benefit by application of concepts
associated with indexing of fiction. Term variability is less than
might have been expected, suggesting some constraints may exist
on the process of communicating about visually perceived data. The
data are of interest in terms of what they suggest about human perception
of and communication about complex images.
Time: Pizza
and drinks at 5:30; informal talk 6-ish
Back
to Top
Back to Calendar
Wednesday,
April 15, 1998
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
JANET
DEAN FODOR
"WHAT
IS A PARAMETER?"
Recent research
in learnability has made it clear that for natural language there
can be no instant "automatic" triggering of parameters.
This is because the trigger properties in natural languages are often
deep properties, not recognizable without parsing the input sentence.
Current approaches
such as Gibson and Wexler (LI 1994) therefore use the parsing routines
to identify triggers. Unfortunately, the proposed mechanism for
doing so if very inefficient. I show that this is because it does
not respect the Parametric Principle: it evaluates millions of particular
grammars, rather than establishing the values of 20 or 30 parameters.
By tracking
out why this is so, I have found a remedy for it. There is a way
of using the parser that does implement the Parametric Principle.
But it calls for a new conception of parameters and of their triggers:
they are one and the same thing, and consist of features of small
treelets, made available by UG and adoptable into individual grammars.
This conclusion
is in accord with most current theories of syntactic parameterization,
including the Minimalist program, HPSG and TAG theory.
All
are welcome
Refreshments will be served
Back to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday,
April 22, 1998
2:00 - 3:30 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
ROBERTO CASATI
"WHAT
SOUNDS ARE"
The physicalist
reduction of sounds seems to be achieved once we identify sounds with
sound waves in a medium in which a sounding object (and possibly a
hearer) is present. This raises some objections and leaves some questions
open. Among other things, the relationship between the sound and the
sounding object remains in the dark. I shall suggest that there is
another and more promising candidate for the physical identification
of sounds, namely processes or events inside (or at the surface of)
sounding objects, or in the stuff of the sounding object. Three main
issues will be discussed in the talk: the location of sounds, their
nature, and the perceptual representation we have of them.
All
are welcome to attend
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Top
Back
to Calendar
Wednesday,
April 29, 1998
2:00 - 3:30 p.m.
280 Park Hall
North Campus
INGVAR
JOHANSSON
Department
of Philosophy
University of Umea, Sweden
"The
Ontology of Patterns"
Most ontologists
regard patterns as some kind of easily analyzed subcategory, a mere
by-product in need of no special attention. This view I will challenge.
I think that, in fact, pattern belongs to the top-level categories,
and that a close scrutiny of its specifica differentia may be of interest
both for ontologists and for cognitive scientists. I will, as a starting
point for discussion, list certain features which accrue to patterns:
the feature of fiatness, the feature of non-reducibility to a set
or aggregate of properties, parts or relations, the feature of having
that kind of objective existence which can be represented cognitively
(via language and perception). Reference will also be made to the
question whether all patterns can be represented pictorially.
All
are welcome
Refreshments will be served
Back
to Calendar
Back
to Top
|