|
August
29 Francisco Gil-White
September
5 Business Meeting
12 Ezra Zubrow
19 Leonard Talmy
26 Kristin Tjaden
October
3 Harry Heft
10 Robert van Gulick
17 Tamar Gendler
24 Suzanne MacDonald
31 Nicholas Leibovic
November
7 canceled
14 Keith Oatley
21 Thanksgiving
28 Shaun Gallagher
December
5 Allison Sekuler
|
|
| Month |
Day |
Speaker
and Title |
| August |
29 |
Francisco
Gil-White, Ph.D.,
fjgil@psych.upenn.edu
Department
of Psychology,
University
of Pennsylvania
"Cognitively
Speaking, What is an Ethnic Category?"
Co-sponsored
by the Departments of Anthropology
and Philosophy
|
| September |
5 |
Business
Meeting
|
|
|
12 |
Ezra
Zubrow,
Ph.D., zubrow@acsu.buffalo.edu,
Department
of Anthropology,
UB "The
Origin of Music"
Back
to Top |
|
|
19 |
Leonard
Talmy, Ph.D., talmy@acsu.buffalo.edu
Dept. of Linguistics,
Center for Cognitive Science,
UB
"The
Representation of Spatial Structure in Spoken and Signed Language"
|
|
|
26 |
Kristin
Tjaden
, Ph.D., tjaden@acsu.buffalo.edu,
Department
of Communicative Disorders and Sciences,
UB
"Acoustic-Perceptual
Distinctiveness and
Coarticulatory patterns in Dysarthria"
|
| October |
3 |
Harry
Heft,
Ph.D., heft@denison.edu
Department
of Psychology,
Denison
University,
Ohio From
"Thing and Medium" to Ecological Psychology:
A Tale of Two Research Programs
Back
to Top |
| |
10 |
"Maps,
Gaps, and Traps: Metaphors for
Understanding Consciousness"
|
| |
17 |
"Philosophical
implications of research
on childhood pretense"
|
| |
24 |
Studying
Memory and Cognition in Zoo Primates:
Rewards and Challenges
|
| |
31 |
"Brain
and Vision"
|
| November |
7 |
Cancelled
Andre
Kukla , Ph.D., andre.kukla@utoronto.ca
Department of Psychology, University
of Toronto
"Epistemic Boundedness"
|
| |
14 |
Keith
Oatley, Ph.D.,
koatley@oise.utoronto.ca, Department
of Applied Psychology, University
of Toronto
"Emotions
and the Psychology of Fiction"
Back to Top
|
| |
21 |
Thanksgiving
|
| |
28 |
Shaun
Gallagher, Ph.D., gallaghr@canisius.edu,
Department of Philosophy and Cognitive Science Program, Canisius
College, Buffalo, NY
"Expressive
Movement in a Deafferented Subject"
Back to Top
|
| December |
5 |
Allison
Sekuler, Ph.D, sekuler@mcmaster.ca,
Department
of Psychology, McMaster University, Canada
"Visual
Completion: A Case Study in Grouping
and Perceptual Organization"
Back to Top
|
Abstracts
Wednesday, August 29, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Francisco
Gil-White, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
University of Pennsylvania
"Cognitively
Speaking,
What is an Ethnic Category?"
If,
despite the fact that ethnic essences do not exist, ethnic actors
nevertheless represent ethnies as essentialized natural groups,
we must understand why. This talk will present and defend the argument
that humans process ethnic groups (and a few other related social
categories) as if they were species - with the associated essentialism
- because their surface similarities to species make them inputs
to the living kinds mental module that initially evolved to process
species-level categories. The similarities in processing between
species and ethnic categories will be explored (the main responsible
similarities are category-based endogamy, and descent-based membership),
and an evolutionary argument for this pyschological borrowing from
'living kinds' reasoning to the social domain will be defended.
In a nutshell, I will argue that thinking about ethnies as if they
were species was adaptive in the ancestral environment because it
solved problems of inference and coordination in the domain of interactional
norms.
Co-sponsored by the Departments of Anthropology
and Philosophy
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
September 12, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Ezra
Zubrow, Ph.D.
Department of Anthropology
University at Buffalo
"The
Origin of Music"
This
paper reports on the recent results of a joint project between the
University of Buffalo and University of Cambridge. There are four
results:
- Bone
flutes and percussion instruments have been found -the former
dating 33K and the latter perhaps 50K.
- One
may predict and simulate the sounds of these instruments.
- Cognitively,
one may predict that music precedes language.
- One
may examine the causal role that music has in the evolutionary
and cognitive relationships among Homo sapiens, Homo sapiens neanderthalensis,
and homo erectus.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
September 19, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Leonard
Talmy, Ph.D.
Department of Linguistics
Center for Cognitive Science
University
at Buffalo
"The
Representation of Spatial Structure in Spoken and Signed Language"
Linguistic
research to date has determined many of the factors that structure
the spatial schemas found across spoken languages. It is now
feasible to integrate these factors and to determine the comprehensive
system they constitute for spatial structuring in spoken language.
This system is characterized by several features: It has a relatively
closed universally available inventory of fundamental spatial elements
that are combined to form whole schemas. It has a relatively closed
set of categories that these elements appear in. And it has
a relatively closed small number of particular elements in each
category, hence, of spatial distinctions that each category can
ever mark.
An examination of signed language shows that its structural representation
of space systematically differs from that in spoken language in
the direction of what appear to be the structural characteristics
of scene parsing in visual perception. Such differences include
the following: Signed language can mark finer spatial distinctions
with its inventory of more structural elements, more categories,
and more elements per category. It represents many more of
these distinctions in any particular expression. It also represents
these distinctions independently in the expression, not bundled
together into "pre-packaged" schemas. And its spatial
representations are largely iconic with visible spatial characteristics.
The findings suggest that instead of some discrete whole-language
module, spoken language and signed language are both based on some
more limited core linguistic system that then connects with different
further subsystems for the full functioning of the two different
language modalities.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
September 26, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Kristin
Tjaden, Ph.D.
Department of Communicative Disorders
and Sciences
University at Buffalo
"Acoustic-Perceptual
Distinctiveness and Coarticulatory patterns in Dysarthria"
The
dysarthrias are a group of communicative disorders resulting from
impairment to central and/or peripheral nervous system structures
important for the motor execution of speech. From a functional viewpoint,
speech intelligibility and naturalness may be impaired owing to
reduced speed, strength, range, accuracy, and timing of speech movements
in the respiratory-laryngeal, velopharyngeal, and oral articulatory
mechanisms. Although a great deal of progress has been made in characterizing
the speech production deficits associated with the various dysarthrias,
vocal tract activity in dysarthria remains poorly understood. The
current presentation focuses on oral articulatory impairments associated
with Parkinson's disease, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), and
Multiple Sclerosis, as inferred from the acoustic speech signal.
In addition to describing how these neurologic diseases affect the
articulatory-acoustic working space for individuals' habitual or
normal speech mode, changes in the acoustic working space associated
with speech rate and vocal intensity manipulations will be discussed.
The relationship between the size of the acoustic working space
and auditory-perceptual impressions of speech also will be discussed
as well as coarticulatory differences for individuals with dysarthria
and neurologically healthy speakers. Finally, the theoretical implications
of a relationship between coarticulatory patterns in dysarthria
and the size of the articulatory-acoustic working space will be
considered..
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
October 3, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Harry Heft, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
Denison University
From "Thing and Medium" to Ecological Psychology:
A Tale of Two Research Programs
In the middle decades of the 20th century, two psychologists --
James Gibson working in perception, Roger Barker working in social
development - separately proposed an ecological psychology that
was a radical break from standard approaches in their respective
areas. Although each employed the label 'ecological psychology'
to describe their contributions, their proposed programs were distinctly
dissimilar from each other, both with respect to their problem focus
and also with regard to their level of analysis. In keeping with
these notable differences, theory and research in each program proceeded
independently. And yet, in spite of their notable differences, each
program embraced as one of its foundational ideas Fritz Heider's
(1926) highly original analysis of 'thing and medium.' This presentation
will identify some of the distinctive and significant contributions
of each ecological program, examine their common ties to Heider's
seminal work, and offer an integrated view of an ecological psychology
that functions at both the level of individual-environment interaction
and collective social processes.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
October 10, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Robert
Van Gulick, Ph.D.
Department of Philosophy
Syracuse University
"Maps,
Gaps, and Traps: Metaphors for Understanding Consciousness"
The
metaphors we use to talk about the problem of consciousness can
both illuminate and restrict our understanding. They can reveal
otherwise hidden aspects, or blind us to things outside their perspective.
The much invoked metaphor of the "explanatory gap" - first
coined by Joe Levine - provides a good case study (others might
include Chalmer's Hard Problem/ Easy Problem distinction, or Nagel's
equation of being a conscious x with "there being something
that it's like to be an x".) The gap metaphor is both powerful
but ambiguous in ways that can lead us astray if we do not can take
care. I will explore the metaphor and its many meanings, in hope
to dispel confusion and foster greater understanding of the mind/matter
basis of consciousness.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
October 17, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Tamar
Gendler Ph.D.
Department of Philosophy
Syracuse University
"Philosophical
Implications of Research
on Childhood Pretense"
Recent empirical
research concerning children's games of pretense seems to show that
they are marked by the presence of two central features, which I call
quarantining' and 'fertility'. Quarantining is manifest to the extent
that causes within the pretense-episode are taken to have effects
only within the pretense-episode (so, for example, the child does
not expect the table really to be wet if the child "spills the
tea"). Fertility is manifest to the extent that features of the
imaginary situation that have not been explicitly stipulated are derivable
via features of their real-world analogues (so, for example, the child
does expect the table to be wet in the pretence if she up-ends the
teapot above its surface). At the same time, from the same early age,
it seems that both quarantining and fertility are constrained in crucial
ways. Quarantining gives way to 'contagion' in cases of affect-laden
imagination (so, for example, a child who imagines a bear on the staircase
may be reluctant to go upstairs alone). And fertility gives way to
'unproductivity' as a result of the fundamental incompleteness of
the imaginary (so, for example, there may be no fact of the matter
(in the pretence) just how much "tea" there is left in the
teapot). Exactly when and how these constraints relate to the principles
to which they are exceptions raises complicated and interesting questions.
In
my talk, I will present these distinctions in light of recent empirical
research, and discuss some of their implications for a number of
issues of current philosophical discussion in epistemology, aesthetics
and the philosophy of mind.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
October 24, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Suzanne
MacDonald, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
York University, Canada
"Studying
Memory and Cognition
in Zoo Primates:
Rewards and Challenges"
Exploring memory
and cognition in nonhuman primates has traditionally been done in
laboratory situations. While labs offer great experimental control,
the range of species that can be studied is limited. Zoo animals offer
a unique opportunity to examine cognitive processes in a wide variety
of species.
In
this talk, I will focus on my research with prosimians, New and
Old World monkeys, and Great Apes. I'll discuss my findings on spatial
memory and foraging strategies, as well as my current work on abstract
concept discrimination, communication, and social cognition.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday, October 31, 2001
2:00 pm - 3:30 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
K.
Nicholas Leibovic, Ph.D.
Department of Biophysical Sciences, UB
"Brain
and Vision"
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
CANCELLED! Watch
for news on a new speaker!
Wednesday,
November 7, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Andre
Kukla, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology and Philosophy
University of Toronto, Scarborough, Canada
"Epistemic
Boundedness"
A
psychological theory represents the mind as epistemically bounded
if it is a consequence of the theory that our cognitive organization
imposes epistemically significant constraints on the beliefs that
we can entertain. Three arguments for epistemic boundedness are
evaluated. Two of them-Colin McGinn's argument and the argument
from mediocrity-are found to be defective. The third-Jerry Fodor's-underwrite
no more than the relatively weak conclusion that we are dialectically
justified in presuming that the mind is epistemically bounded when
conversing with our cognitive-scientific colleagues.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
November 14, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Keith
Oatley, Ph.D.
Department of Psychology
University of Toronto, Canada
"Emotions
and the
Psychology of Fiction"
Fiction
is typically highly structured. The goal of its writers can be thought
of as offering materials to a reader (or audience member) so that
they can construct and run cognitive simulations. Though such simulations
run on minds rather than on computers, the analogy is close. Like
computer simulations, fictions have aspects that correspond to (a)
real-world models and (b) instructions as to how to compute over
these models. In literary theory these aspects have been called
fabula (the story world, or event structure) and siujhet (plot,
or discourse structure). I will discuss two further aspects. One
is the suggestion structure, which is based on priming and other
such devices; it sets up resonances with the reader and prompts
her or his own emotions and memories. The other is the realization:
the enactment, or inner performance, of the fictional piece in the
mind of reader as she or he runs the simulation in a way that—if
the fiction is successful—involves the emotions. I shall present
empirical evidence for some of these claims. This evidence includes
demonstrations that people do indeed experience emotions when they
read short stories, and that these emotions shape their understandings
of, and reasoning about, the stories.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday, November 28, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Shaun
Gallagher, Ph.D.
Department of of Philosophy
and Cognitive Science
Canisius College
"Expressive
Movement in a Deafferented Subject"
Explanations
of neonate imitation of facial gestures have been framed in terms
of motor ability and intermodal perception (Meltzoff and Moore,
1977; 1993; 1995). Meltzoff and his colleagues have offered explanations
that rely on concepts like an innate body schema, perception and
action coupling, and the reproduction of movement based on matching
proprioception to visual stimulus (Chaminade , Decety, and Meltzoff,
in press; Decety, et al., 2001; Gallagher and Meltzoff, 1996). I
want to ask whether imitation of facial gestures is given a full
account in these terms, or whether there might be some other mechanism
that needs to be considered. To provide a framework for this question,
I examine a case where gesture is clearly dissociated from certain
aspects of normal motor ability, that is, where gesture, as a form
of expressive movement, is irreducible to instrumental or locomotive
movement. The case is that of IW, a man who lives without the sense
of touch and proprioception below the neck. IW has profound problems
with both locomotive and instrumental movement. Without proprioception
he is not capable of controlling his movement without conscious
use of vision and cognitive effort. When he wants to pick up a glass
from the table, for example, he must think through his movement,
consciously calculating distance, trajectory, grip, pressure, etc.
Despite these problems with movement, IW, with and without vision,
is capable of conversational gestures that are in most regards normal.
I will report on experiments that show in precise terms that this
is the case. I will also offer a theoretical account (in contrast
to motor theories of gesture) to explain why gestures are not reducible
to instrumental or locomotive movement. If gesture is a form of
expressive movement that is not reducible to instrumental or locomotive
movement, and if imitation of gestures is also a form of expressive
movement, then I want to suggest that neonate imitation of facial
gesture is not fully accounted for by innate body schemas, or other
terms that focus on movement alone.
For
a printable version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
Wednesday,
December 5, 2001
2:00 pm - 4:00 pm
280 Park Hall
North Campus
Allison
Sekuler, Ph.D.
Department of of Psychology, McMaster University
Canada
"Visual
Completion: A Case Study in Grouping and Perceptual Organization"
One of the most
important goals of vision is to recognize objects so that we can
interact appropriately with them. Our everyday experiences suggest
that the visual system is finely tuned to achieve this goal: recognition
seems to occur instantly and effortlessly. However, research in
my lab and others reveals that perceptual organization and recognition
are much more complex processes than our phenomenology would lead
us to believe. This lecture focuses on one aspect of my research:
The perception of partly occluded objects. Because the information
reaching our eyes is often incomplete, occlusion represents a huge
obstacle to our perception of the world. I will describe evidence
that the visual system completes contours and makes use of those
completed contours. I will also discuss the effects of spatio-temporal
context on visual completion, and I will describe our approach to
combining behavioural methods with neuroimaging. Our results suggest
that completion acts as a grouping mechanism enabling observers
to use the relevant parts of the stimulus more efficiently for shape
discrimination and object recognition. In this sense, visual completion
is conceptualized not as end in and of itself, but as means to an
end.
For a printable
version of this file click here
Back
to Calendar Listing
|